Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:47:12 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299080: fixed in henplus 0.9.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 16:25:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 08:25:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9mxT-0003ol-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:25:51 -0800
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148])
by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13CF777F;
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:25:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-6-11.mnet-online.de [82.135.6.11])
by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9278B5C694;
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:25:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AE7100442A0;
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:25:12 +0100 (CET)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: henplus: FTBFS
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:25:12 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: henplus
Version: 0.9.5-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package henplus in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=========================================================================
[...]
touch debian/build-arch-stamp
yada patch "debian/patches/*.patch"
touch debian/build-indep-stamp
yada patch "debian/patches/*.patch"
export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/sablevm
export JAVA=/usr/bin/java-sablevm
export JAVAC=/usr/bin/jikes-sablevm
export JAVACMD=$JAVA
export JARS=/usr/share/java
export ANT_HOME=/usr/share/ant1.6
export CLASSPATH=\
$JARS/xerces.jar:\
$ANT_HOME/lib/ant.jar:\
$ANT_HOME/lib/ant-launcher.jar:\
$JARS/libreadline-java.jar
ANT_OPTS="-Dbuild.compiler=jikes -Dant.home=$ANT_HOME"
ANT="$JAVACMD -classpath $CLASSPATH org.apache.tools.ant.Main $ANT_OPTS"
$ANT jar
Buildfile: build.xml
prepare:
BUILD FAILED
/tmp/buildd/henplus-0.9.5/build.xml:19: java.lang.NullPointerException
Total time: 0 seconds
make: *** [debian/build-stamp] Error 1
=========================================================================
Thanks for considering.
--
DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 299080-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 20:53:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 12:53:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9r8p-0003tD-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:53:52 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9r2O-00061D-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:47:12 -0500
From: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#299080: fixed in henplus 0.9.5-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:47:12 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: henplus
Source-Version: 0.9.5-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
henplus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
henplus_0.9.5-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/h/henplus/henplus_0.9.5-2.diff.gz
henplus_0.9.5-2.dsc
to pool/main/h/henplus/henplus_0.9.5-2.dsc
henplus_0.9.5-2_all.deb
to pool/main/h/henplus/henplus_0.9.5-2_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated henplus package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:59:55 +0100
Source: henplus
Binary: henplus
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
henplus - JDBC SQL commandline frontend with TAB-completion
Closes: 299080
Changes:
henplus (0.9.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Build with kaffe. sablevm generates java.lang.NullPointerException.
Closes: #299080.
Files:
805e239bee4c494e5aab85583a6d5a50 692 utils optional henplus_0.9.5-2.dsc
a0b12c4e5446a158a3d944592f7697a2 8001 utils optional henplus_0.9.5-2.diff.gz
6ee796bd00e779ab7c352088c6f75598 147526 utils optional henplus_0.9.5-2_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCMfpihMHHe8CxClsRAiWcAKCdyLQyvThcOrdcUoERCQ1hr1F4tgCfWKES
hsLfBl63ae52EA0shCBbizg=
=O/4X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
