At Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:50:19 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or > > linux-kernel-headers package? > > > > Regards, > > -- gotom > > I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because they have the bug and > lvm because it can work around it (thereby reducing its severity to > normal).
OK. Bastian separated this bug report into #297010 and #298488. > If you don't think l-k-h oder libc6-dev should implement the O_NOATIME > it documents then please reassign it to lvm2 alone with an > explanation. That is your perogative as maintainer but I stand by my > decision that it is a critical bug and both packages are involved. I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2. Glibc should also be fixed. However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the actual critical bug, and if lvm needs to use kernel headers, lvm should have such header definition itself. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
