Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 04:04:03PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
reassign 294992 erlang
merge 294992 276800
Hmm, why did you do that merge? From the bug reports I can't see any
connection between them. Apart from the fact that 294992 was tagged
"sarge" and 276800 "sid", so I really don't see, how they could belong
together.
Long description: if erlang would be fixed as described in 276800 than
erlang and ejabberd could go into sarge and 294992 would become invalid.
That is why the merge was not _so_ wrong...
Regards,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
