Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:09:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > I think de4x5 should be a driver of last resort. Tulip should always > > > be preferred to drive a given piece of hardware. I wouldn't shed any > > > tears if we stopped shipping de4x5 by default -- it's caused no end of > > > problems on parisc and ia64. > > > > OTOH it's the only module that can drive the ethernet card of my a500 > > (hppa). > > I think you have that backwards. de4x5 *doesn't* work on hppa whereas > tulip does.
You're right and actually I remember now that I went to a lot of bother to make d-i/hppa force use of tulip instead of de4x5. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
