Your message dated Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:32:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#293439: fixed in mantis 0.19.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2005 12:37:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 03 04:37:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 195.70.144.7.adsl.nextra.cz (cindy) [195.70.144.7] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CwgEe-0001YP-00; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 04:37:24 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([::ffff:192.168.1.2])
  (IDENT: Debian-exim)
  by cindy with esmtp; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 13:36:52 +0100
Received: from mixi by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CwgEE-0004Il-4r; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 13:36:58 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Miroslav Maiksnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mantis.postinst failed
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 13:36:58 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: mantis
Version: 0.19.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-alfons32-2
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages mantis depends on:
ii  apache [httpd]               1.3.33-3    versatile, high-performance HTTP s
ii  apache2-mpm-prefork [httpd]  2.0.52-3    Traditional model for Apache2
ii  debconf                      1.4.30.11   Debian configuration management sy
ii  grep                         2.5.1.ds1-4 GNU grep, egrep and fgrep
ii  libapache2-mod-php4          4:4.3.10-2  server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  libphp-adodb                 4.52-1      The 'adodb' database abstraction l
ii  makepasswd                   1.10-2      Generate and encrypt passwords
ii  mysql-client                 4.0.23-3    mysql database client binaries
ii  php4-cgi                     4:4.3.10-2  server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-cli                     4:4.3.10-2  command-line interpreter for the p
ii  php4-mysql                   4:4.3.10-2  MySQL module for php4
ii  wwwconfig-common             0.0.42      Debian web auto configuration

-- debconf information:
  mantis/title: Mantis
* mantis/url: http://localhost/mantis/
  mantis/bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* mantis/db_autoupdate: true
* mantis/ldap: false
  mantis/ldap_server: localhost
  mantis/version:
  mantis/from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mantis/show_version: true
  mantis/root_mysql: root
  mantis/signup: true
  mantis/admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mantis/ldap_info:
* mantis/username: mantis
  mantis/webmaster: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* mantis/purge_db: true
  mantis/dn: dn=
  mantis/mysql_port: 3306
* mantis/webserver: apache, apache-ssl
* mantis/app_configure: true
  mantis/language: english
* mantis/mysql_server: localhost
* mantis/database: bugtracker
  mantis/organisation:


-- apt output:
Setting up mantis (0.19.2-1) ...
I: Using password from existing config file.
I: Creating database user 'mantis'
I: User created.
I: Adding database 'bugtracker'
I: No need to create database.
Rotated `/etc/mantis/config.php' at Thu Feb  3 13:22:54 CET 2005.
I: creating /etc/mantis/config.php
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mantis.postinst: line 32: [: /etc/apache: binary
operator expected
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mantis.postinst: line 24: [: /etc/apache: binary
operator expected
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mantis.postinst: line 23: [: /etc/apache: binary
operator expected
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mantis.postinst: line 35: /etc/apache
apache-ssl/httpd.conf: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing mantis (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
 

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 293439-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 00:38:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 09 16:38:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Cz2LT-0004XE-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:38:11 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Cz2Fj-0007pO-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:32:15 -0500
From: Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#293439: fixed in mantis 0.19.2-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:32:15 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7

Source: mantis
Source-Version: 0.19.2-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mantis, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

mantis_0.19.2-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/mantis/mantis_0.19.2-2.diff.gz
mantis_0.19.2-2.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mantis/mantis_0.19.2-2.dsc
mantis_0.19.2-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mantis/mantis_0.19.2-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated mantis package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  9 Feb 2005 23:40:31 +0100
Source: mantis
Binary: mantis
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.19.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 mantis     - web-based bug tracking system
Closes: 284478 291728 291748 292076 292432 293372 293439 293470
Changes: 
 mantis (0.19.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Inclusion of /etc/mantis/apache.conf is now done via a symlink
     in /etc/$APACHEFLAVOR/conf.d. Quoting has been fixed (Closes: #293439)
   * mantis/ldap_info is no longer shown (Closes: #284478)
   * Updated Danish, German, Brazilian, Japanese, French Debconf templates,
     thanks to Morten Brix Pedersen, Jens Nachtigall, Andre Luis Lopes,
     Hideki Yamane, Christian Perrier (Closes: #291728, #291748, #292076,
     #292432, #293372)
   * Fixed copyright file (Closes: #293470)
Files: 
 b773c234e1b9058995b36463d229a956 568 web optional mantis_0.19.2-2.dsc
 087b59da4ea68c29aef4deb6f286c9aa 33486 web optional mantis_0.19.2-2.diff.gz
 a34481fcceceddfc8c9a703eaa97788d 894256 web optional mantis_0.19.2-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCCqdSUCgnLz/SlGgRAslgAJsF0JHISS5Kx59EkdgeQonxg6R9qwCgqMK6
g+gnkuE1dPYhOf3+AdAwyhU=
=Ekbm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to