Il giorno mer, 09-02-2005 alle 20:58 +0100, Oliver Siegmar ha scritto: > It is a brand new sarge installation - I haven't tweaked anything. > So...everyone will get this error in the first place if he/she doesn't > configure anything manually, right? > > At least the installation script should perform a 'hostname -f' or something > to avoid this kind of errors and to enable visible_hostname by itself.
What would you suggest it'd be a reasonable value for visible_hostname if there's no FQDN set? > So I think it is a grave bug. From rom http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer.en.html grave makes the package in question unusable or mostly so, or causes data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the accounts of users who use the package. Do you see this bug makeing the package unusable or causing data loss or introducing a security hole? Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
