Your message dated Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:32:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289057: fixed in amule 1.2.6+rc8-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2005 23:14:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 06 15:14:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CmgpZ-00065W-00; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:14:13 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 46647224156
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  7 Jan 2005 00:14:12 +0100 (MET)
Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5775FD9.kabel.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
        by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBC722414F
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  7 Jan 2005 00:14:12 +0100 (MET)
Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
        id 7F6E426136; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:14:11 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:14:11 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: amule: FTBFS: Missing/wrong/old build dependency?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: amule
Verison: 1.2.6+rc8-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build.  Here is an extract from
the build logs:
checking for wx-config... /usr/bin/wx-config
checking for wxWidgets version >= 2.4.2... yes (version 2.5.3)
configure: WARNING: wxWidgets >=2.5.0: Using wx-config --libs base,net
checking if wxWidgets was linked with GTK2... yes
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.3... no
*** Could not run GTK+ test program, checking why...
*** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ is incorrectly installed.
Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gtk+-2.0.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'gtk+-2.0' found
checking if wxWidgets version >=2.5.0 ... yes
[...]
if g++ -Os -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..      -I/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode
-release-2.5 -I/usr/include/wx-2.5 -DGTK_NO_CHECK_CASTS -D__WXGTK__ -D_FILE_OFF
SET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES    -D__GTK2__   -DUSE_EMBEDDED_CRYPTO  -O2  -MT amul
e-listctrl.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/amule-listctrl.Tpo" -c -o amule-listctrl.o `tes
t -f 'listctrl.cpp' || echo './'`listctrl.cpp; \
then mv -f ".deps/amule-listctrl.Tpo" ".deps/amule-listctrl.Po"; else rm -f ".d
eps/amule-listctrl.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
listctrl.cpp:89:25: gtk/gtk.h: No such file or directory
In file included from listctrl.cpp:90:
/usr/include/wx-2.5/wx/gtk/win_gtk.h:18:21: gdk/gdk.h: No such file or director
y
/usr/include/wx-2.5/wx/gtk/win_gtk.h:19:22: gdk/gdkx.h: No such file or directo
ry
/usr/include/wx-2.5/wx/gtk/win_gtk.h:20:30: gtk/gtkcontainer.h: No such file or
 directory
/usr/include/wx-2.5/wx/gtk/win_gtk.h:21:31: gtk/gtkadjustment.h: No such file o
r directory

In previous builds this looked like:
checking for wx-config... /usr/bin/wx-config
checking for wxWidgets version >= 2.4.2... yes (version 2.4.2)
checking for wxbase-2.4-config... /usr/bin/wxbase-2.4-config
checking for wxWidgets base version >= 2.4.2... yes (version 2.4.2)
checking if wxWidgets was linked with GTK2... no
checking for gtk-config... /usr/bin/gtk-config
checking for GTK - version >= 1.2.0... yes
checking if wxWidgets version >=2.5.0 ... no
[...]
if g++ -Os -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..      -I/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk-2.4 -DGT
K_NO_CHECK_CASTS -D__WXGTK__ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -I/usr/inclu
de/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include    -DUSE_EMBEDDED_CR
YPTO  -O2  -MT amule-listctrl.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/amule-listctrl.Tpo" \
  -c -o amule-listctrl.o `test -f 'listctrl.cpp' || echo './'`listctrl.cpp; \
then mv -f ".deps/amule-listctrl.Tpo" ".deps/amule-listctrl.Po"; \
else rm -f ".deps/amule-listctrl.Tpo"; exit 1; \
fi

Note that there was a -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 in that case, and
some other differences.


Kurt


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 289057-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2005 18:38:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 09 10:38:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CywjO-0006jW-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 10:38:30 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CywdJ-0000ni-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:32:13 -0500
From: Julien Delange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#289057: fixed in amule 1.2.6+rc8-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:32:13 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: amule
Source-Version: 1.2.6+rc8-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
amule, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

amule-utils_1.2.6+rc8-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/amule/amule-utils_1.2.6+rc8-2_i386.deb
amule_1.2.6+rc8-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/amule/amule_1.2.6+rc8-2.diff.gz
amule_1.2.6+rc8-2.dsc
  to pool/main/a/amule/amule_1.2.6+rc8-2.dsc
amule_1.2.6+rc8-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/amule/amule_1.2.6+rc8-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Delange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated amule package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  9 Jan 2005 11:24:39 +0100
Source: amule
Binary: amule amule-utils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.6+rc8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien Delange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Julien Delange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 amule      - aNOTHER eMule P2P Client
 amule-utils - utilities for amule
Closes: 289057
Changes: 
 amule (1.2.6+rc8-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Add missing dependencies (Closes: #289057)
Files: 
 c5298ed82b9819c6f0a03e820080046e 671 x11 optional amule_1.2.6+rc8-2.dsc
 86ef6289f840a6b822e56cf413d35e98 19018 x11 optional amule_1.2.6+rc8-2.diff.gz
 391d1e58dfe359ea4ee0268bc727c743 2384730 x11 optional 
amule_1.2.6+rc8-2_i386.deb
 3eb9db5aeb3fc94c8168b5b2a1e66d37 487078 x11 optional 
amule-utils_1.2.6+rc8-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCClIipGK1HsL+5c0RAjt3AKC5Ast696NWlfhf9LtDCu1WmO3U7gCfbRgG
NGC4oKD+q1QQkUloF2FVDWA=
=jPZs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to