Ar 03/02/2005 am 01:22, ysgrifennodd Danilo Åegan: > In particular, many Cyrillic glyphs are incorrectly scaled (perhaps > due to different em-sizes? I don't know). Metrics are also wrong > (and they seem to be wrong in the same way as the glyphs size is): > > http://kvota.net/fonts/urwcyr/nimbus-mono.png > > This applies to Nimbus Mono L Oblique, Bold and Bold Oblique faces. > If I load /usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/* in FontForge, I see that > some glyphs have width of 600, and others have width of 747 (a bit > strange for monospace font, but not too strange once you look at the > glyphs, whose size varies as well :).
Is this problem only with Nimbus Mono? Perhaps you could provide a screenshot with a font that isn't broken for comparison purposes. > Also, Nimbus Sans Regular and Regular Condensed look exactly the same > for me (this could be due to some font fields not being set fully, > but I'm not sure). > > Similarly, URW Bookman L Light gives me Demi Bold variant. For URW > Gothic L, Book looks like Demi, and Demi Oblique looks like Book > Oblique. Also, URW Palladio L Roman actually displays bold, just what > Century Schoolbook L Roman does as well. > > All this is tested using gedit. It might conceivably be a problem with fonts being cached in some way. Could you see if you have these problems with the latest package in Debian? It would be useful to know whetehr these are regressions I've introduced or not. Thanks a lot for your testing work! -- Dafydd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
