On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 03:02:54PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:48:28PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 04:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > I don't quite understand how this would be gs-gpl's fault, it's either > > > gs-common (because of an error during the configuration) or apt/dpkg, > > > isn't it? Do you have a complete log of the install, I suspect there > > > was an error during configuring gs-common. > > > > I reported it against gs-gpl because that was what failed to compile.
Oops. I meant configure, not compile. > > There appears to be a dependency loop between gs-gpl, gs-common, and > > gs. > > Ok, now I understand. Although I find it rather normal that gs-gpl > depends on gs-common but rather weird that gs-common in turn depends > on gs. I would therefor propose to reassign the bug to gs-common. That sounds good to me. -- Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
