Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:27:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290043: running reportbug needs an old version of python
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2005 15:08:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 12 07:08:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (haneman.hacenet) [217.188.237.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cok6b-0000FG-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:08:18 -0800
Received: from intuidev by haneman.hacenet with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Cok5y-0001Ki-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:07:38 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Enver Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: running reportbug needs an old version of python
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:07:38 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Enver Haase as a developer for Intuitive Intelligence <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.5
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to file a bug report against some other package,
"reportbug" did not work; instead it told me there was something
wrong with the "import site" statement of /usr/bin/reportbug
in line 27.
http://python.active-venture.com/lib/module-site.html
says: In earlier versions of Python (up to and including 1.5a3),
scripts or modules that needed to use site-specific modules would
place "import site" somewhere near the top of their code. This is
no longer necessary.
As it seems, this piece of code must no longer be executed when
a recent (say Debian unstable as of today) python is installed.
regards,
Enver
-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
EDITOR="joe"
** /home/intuidev/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "3.5"
mode standard
ui text
realname "Enver Haase"
email "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii python2.3 2.3.4-19 An interactive high-level object-o
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 290043-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2005 20:27:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 14 12:27:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.56]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CpY2j-0001oB-00; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:27:37 -0800
Received: from andromeda (syr-24-59-54-124.twcny.rr.com [24.59.54.124])
by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j0EKRZJj001500
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:27:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CpY2g-0006ij-8h
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:27:34 -0500
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:27:34 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#290043: running reportbug needs an old version of python
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 03:58:34PM +0100, Enver Haase wrote:
>
> Below is the output of reportbug on my system with a
> (you guessed right!) missing /etc/python2.3/site.py
> due to a system restore (old /etc/ on an otherwise
> newly set-up system).
> Idiotic thing is that is seems a python "dpkg -i"
> is only possibl when a site.py is already there, but
> I had one as a backup, reportbug works again.
>
> Request closing this bug, with big thanks!
>
> --Enver
>
>
> haneman:/etc# LC_ALL=C reportbug
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 27, in ?
> import site
> ImportError: No module named site
>
>
>
> Chris Lawrence wrote:
>
> >Please send the actual text of the error message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >More than likely, you (or someone else on your system or disk failure)
> >has corrupted your /etc/python2.3/site.py file in some way. Please
> >try reinstalling python2.3 and seeing if this fixes the problem.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Justin
aptitude install task-iraf saods9 eclipse sextractor x11iraf wcstools
http://www.justinpryzby.com/debian/
References
[0]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
