Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:08:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 0.15.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2005 21:49:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 11 13:49:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CoTtR-0007VS-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:49:37 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E7AE224083
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:49:36 +0100 (MET)
Received: from kabel.telenet.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
        by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C36A224072
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:49:36 +0100 (MET)
Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
        id E017E26137; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:49:35 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:49:35 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ogre: FTBFS: errors generating configure script: missing build 
dependencies.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ogre
Version: 0.15.1-8
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
cd build-tree/ogre-free && \
  libtoolize --force && \
  aclocal && \
  autoheader && \
  automake --include-deps --add-missing --foreign && \
  autoconf && \
  ./configure --prefix=/usr \
    --host=hppa-linux --build=hppa-linux \
    --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info \
    --with-platform=GLX --with-gl-support=GLX
You should update your `aclocal.m4' by running aclocal.
/usr/share/aclocal/pkg.m4:5: warning: underquoted definition of PKG_CHECK_MODUL
ES
  run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
  or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal
aclocal:acinclude.m4:203: warning: macro `AM_PATH_SDL' not found in library
aclocal:acinclude.m4:237: warning: macro `AM_PATH_SDL' not found in library
OgreMain/src/Makefile.am: installing `./compile'
configure.in:46: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_ERROR
      If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
      See the Autoconf documentation.
configure:20658: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PATH_SDL
make: *** [build-tree/ogre-free/config.status] Error 1

This seems to be caused by a missing build dependency on
libsdl1.2-dev.  After adding that, it can generate the
configure script (with some warnings).

Note that the old scripts where build using automake 1.7
instead of 1.9 and the other warnings go away if you use
that version instead.


Kurt


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 289926-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2005 18:07:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 14 10:07:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lamu.initd.org [213.215.170.198] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CpVrK-0005j4-00; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:07:43 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by lamu.initd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DEB2CCE7
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:14:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lamu.initd.org ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (lamu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
        id 04797-01 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:14:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from host137-102.pool80180.interbusiness.it 
(host137-102.pool80180.interbusiness.it [80.180.102.137])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by lamu.initd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:14:30 +0100 (CET)
Subject: fixed in 0.15.1-9
From: Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:08:09 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at initd.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,BLANK_LINES_70_80 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

The bug was opened just before 0.15.1-9 (that fixes it) hit Incoming.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to