Your message dated Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:01:54 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ndiswrapper should be in contrib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2005 23:42:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 06 15:42:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CmhHC-0002jB-00; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:42:46 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Jan 2005 23:42:14 -0000
Received: from dsl-213-023-036-043.arcor-ip.net (EHLO localhost) (213.23.36.43)
by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 07 Jan 2005 00:42:14 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1545045
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3F9ED1C6CC; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:42:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:42:07 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ndiswrapper should be in contrib
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NQTVMVnDVuULnIzU"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Organization: The Debian Project
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--NQTVMVnDVuULnIzU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: ndiswrapper
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge, sid
Hi,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:58:56PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> > Apparently the dickhead maintainer of ndiswrapper-source has just gone=
=20
> > into his shell and refuses to discuss this problem.
>=20
> Btw, could anyone explain why ndiswrapper is in main? It's only use
> is to run propritary windows drivers inside the linux kernel, so it's
> a clear fit for contrib.
ACK.
Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,
Ren=E9
--=20
.''`. Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
=20
--NQTVMVnDVuULnIzU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB3czO+FmQsCSK63MRAgg3AJ9n9JUcdzZRvG50PIQWehMsACSd7wCdEXJH
BIYfOgoEkTJ3cDM75y1wrZg=
=peKi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--NQTVMVnDVuULnIzU--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 289065-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2005 04:02:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 11 20:02:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from faye.voxel.net [69.9.164.210] (3fb4e1c8944eb8e7f4727aacd5512beb)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CoZhn-0003P9-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:01:59 -0800
Received: from spiral.internal (alb-24-194-62-26.nycap.rr.com [24.194.62.26])
by faye.voxel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45094374F1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:01:55 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: ndiswrapper should be in contrib
From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-eljSeYmjKrRlOxSzLq98"
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:01:54 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-eljSeYmjKrRlOxSzLq98
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I'll assume your lack of response means you agree. Closing this..
--=20
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--=-eljSeYmjKrRlOxSzLq98
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBB5KEx78o9R9NraMQRAjwNAJ9EWQQ69foq67YJfg4R3tfoPGGxawCdEajC
jdCTY2JDcquDLqPW7xw0nk0=
=Nlba
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-eljSeYmjKrRlOxSzLq98--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
