Sorry for my late reply.

I think it would be ibus-anthy or ibus's problem.

At Wed, 7 Mar 2012 19:30:21 +0900 (JST),
hachisukakorok...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
> And 
> ls -l /proc/PID/fd
> shows like below;
> lrwx------ 1 user user 64 2012-03-01 01:38 0 -> /dev/null
> lrwx------ 1 user user 64 2012-03-01 01:38 1 -> /dev/null
> lr-x------ 1 user user 64 2012-03-01 01:38 10 -> pipe:[12905]
> lrwx------ 1 user user 64 2012-03-01 01:38 2 -> /dev/null
> lr-x------ 1 user user 64 2012-03-01 01:38 3 -> pipe:[12906]
> l-wx------ 1 user user 64 2012-03-01 01:38 4 -> pipe:[12906]
> lrwx------ 1 user user 64 2012-03-01 01:38 5 -> socket:[12907]
> lrwx------ 1 user user 64 2012-03-01 01:38 6 -> 
> /home/user/.anthy/last-record2_default.utf8
> lrwx------ 1 user user 64 2012-03-01 01:38 8 -> socket:[12894]
> lrwx------ 1 user user 64 2012-03-01 01:38 9 -> pipe:[12905]

I'm not familiar about ibus, but it seems a process linked with
libanthy remained running, and ibus frontend process would be died.

I'll try to make a Debian environment like you, and reproduce the
issue.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to