-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:11:35PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > hello Simon, > > That patch didn't apply clean. I have redone it and here's the patch and > the result.
Hello Ritesh, My patch is an updated version of 0009-hardened-build-flags.patch, so putting it in debian/patches/ should work just fine. > [snip] > > Please let me know if it satisfies the hardening build flags requirements. Your patch works fine and sets all the necessary flags. It passes a few duplicate $(LDFLAGS), but that shouldn't cause any problems. Regards, Simon - -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPXf0RAAoJEJL+/bfkTDL5+5QQAJPavTipmjfHPqaknzsG6np0 JXL8HUd0b+I52kiGLAskGjMxhoohHqalBtkfF3TzC/rcSKlwCvpRUTSqdLQq51BZ q5r58cTELyoXk/OJ56SNxJeEwl5N/2lrjXm5LNY+NAHAZWilab8LNMDv4BaHfyDL z/ZdZ/h8qOC/O51Ju1nDPj3jd3q/h7mEjht8cAWK7rFl8BB5VdDkSctBeOcPR7+x 6SVidt5mkmwOtprm48VildjKaKpY/ytIBczvYP6wI1zayXlKWCvSq4ayk94ze3fc 32ZxF8eTL3XVv8G8UQexDKx5+1U6nGIThJ1e9Ow84/IRuOLKVPqMS+ERfJkf15YK 3mBmB5SOJpgx3JykUwlMU+Q6mvHJE1TT7QfewMYRgQqtLW4VzVcrtV1DQSKUfcwg JegUhefKfwFrUFrMuHyLgEckTB8siUhVOP38asMO5RAQdAUQLoRMQ0Y5vbSGN5lx LWNdXMvMt+S3zgS4/HGoimQdoIa/WqDquFvNSyz6ramM/ho42YLVK/E/6Cet/jg0 AJTzgRm51a+3Fti6BOSiGlCWV0FGsbu7LfojCBRzkQcq/OVUWs4910ACXPnpnl5i i6JYyAutdoCSai1sN70eBEZNEGMZkCstOq9IhHpbgr2J89V7D2y1rou9IJmojGYA RApiXX7kY33rV3tT4wzD =VXTc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
