Okay then, i will post the failed architectures here once the upload and build is done and we'll keep this bug report open in the mean time (should happen in the next days, when not today).
Anyway big thanks for your advice and sorry for taking unstable way too serious ;) Am Mittwoch, den 29.02.2012, 13:10 +0100 schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl: > Hi! > > Am 29.02.2012 12:57, schrieb bojo42: > > > Hmm, the problem is that the builds should have failed definitely for > > some architectures as they didn't pass upstreams QA requirements and > > even when we have Bug#660854 fixed some will still fail for other > > reasons, especially ia64 and big endian. > > I still don't see the problem. So we have some packages in unstable, > which don't meet upstreams and our qa criteria. So what? It's unstable... > > > > So as soon as we have a fixed package uploaded i am not able to > > supersede version 0.7.9+git20120219-1 on all architectures. Therefore i > > thought removing all of them is the best option. > > > > What do you think now? > > I still don't see the need for a removal of the source package. > However, as soon as you upload a fixed package, we can surely remove the > binary packages on the failing architectures. > > But to the best of my knowledge, removing the binary packages now would > be pointless, as the auto builded will build and upload them again. > > > Best regards, > Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
