Hi! On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:53:56AM -0300, rhatto wrote: > Em Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 07:37:07PM -0200, rhatto escreveu: > > This behavior looks very tricky to spot but your explanation makes sense. > > One > > way to test this possibility would be to update the metadata subtracting the > > interval needed for the backup to take place, i.e, use the start time of the > > backup procedure. > > > > Are you still getting this warning? Could you test with the following patch? > > I just made some small changes in the previous patch. Could you try this one > instead?
Ok, I have unpatched and repatched with what you sent. Tonight the rsync backups already ran with the patch applied that you sent yesterday; it was the first run I had without warnings! :) However, it has to run another day to see if it's really working, but I'm guessing it is fixed. Paul -- Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | E-mail: pau...@debian.org Jabber/GTalk: p...@luon.net | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
