Hi Jacob: * Scott Howard <show...@debian.org>, 2012-02-04, 15:37: >+scidavis (0.2.4-3.1) unstable; urgency=high >+ >+ * Non-maintainer upload. >+ * Added --parallel flag to dh in debian/rules
>This is not appropriate for an NMU. This and the other changes that are not normally good for NMU is because I was overstepping my bounds a bit since I have a prior relationship with the maintainer (we co-maintain librecad and qcad). I know his been busy and a little bit out of it, so I thought I could do him a favor for now. I'll happy to shrink it down to the minimum for now and work with to do a non-NMU for the rest of this stuff later. >+ * use dh_python2 since python-support is deprecated (cleaning up >+ lintian error) >This is not appropriate for an NMU. For now I have no problem shrinking it down and taking care of the rest at a later time. Would adding a dependency on python-support (to fix the lintian error) be appropriate in this NMU or should I stick to just RC bugs? >--- scidavis-0.2.4/debian/patches/lib65.diff 1969-12-31 19:00:00.000000000 >-0500 >+++ scidavis-0.2.4/debian/patches/lib65.diff 2012-02-04 15:31:39.000000000 >-0500 >s/65/64/? yes >@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ >+Description: Don't install modules to /usr/lib >Huh. I hope this is just a typo in the description. The bug report asked for something quite opposite. typo, it's actually in /usr/lib, changed from /usr/lib64 >Also, would you care to justify such short delay[0] and urgency=high? Fixing two RC bugs that are older than 7 days, thus the short delay and high urgency. from devref ยง5.11.1 and [1] [1] http://upsilon.cc/~zack/hacking/debian/rcbw/ I'll cancel the deferred upload and do another one now that is just the RC bugs and tell Reuben about the other stuff later. ~Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
