Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The second could be taken as is: > ------------- > # ls-R handling (taken from old config script, copyright?) > db_input low tetex-bin/lsr-perms || true > db_go > > db_get tetex-bin/lsr-perms > if [ x"$RET" = x"true" ]; then > db_beginblock > db_input low tetex-bin/groupname || true > db_input low tetex-bin/groupperm || true > db_input low tetex-bin/userperm || true > db_endblock > fi > > db_go > -------------- > > Maybe we should change the tetex-bin to tex-common, too.
That would require some additional tweaking: - Read tetex-bin/item, - if it was set, set tex-common/item accordingly and fset tex-common/item SEEN, - unregister tetex-bin/item > The first part is a bit complicated: > ---------------------- > # suggest a user to rename old cnf files (copyright Atsuhito?) > # (upgrade from woody, keep for etch?) > if [ -d /etc/texmf/texmf.d ]; then > if ls /etc/texmf/texmf.d 2> /dev/null | egrep -vq '(\.cnf|\.dpkg-.*|~)$'; > then > db_input medium tetex-bin/cnf_name || true > db_go || true > fi > fi > ---------------------- > > Here I am not sure wether we can take it as is. I see no reason not to take it, if we decide to keep it for etch. What kinds of doubt do you have? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
