For what it is worth, many of these patches are included here: https://github.com/inducer/arpack
-viral On Jan 11, 2012, at 9:18 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the libarpack2 package: > > #654845: libarpack2: ARPACK should link against LAPACK 2.0, and not liblapack > > It has been closed by Sylvestre Ledru <sylves...@debian.org>. > > Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. > If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a > better one in a separate message then please contact Sylvestre Ledru > <sylves...@debian.org> by > replying to this email. > > > -- > 654845: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654845 > Debian Bug Tracking System > Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems > > From: Sylvestre Ledru <sylves...@debian.org> > Subject: Re: Bug#654845: libarpack2: ARPACK should link against LAPACK 2.0, > and not liblapack > Date: January 11, 2012 9:15:22 PM GMT+05:30 > To: roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> > Cc: 654845-d...@bugs.debian.org, "Viral B. Shah" <vi...@mayin.org>, > 654...@bugs.debian.org, cont...@bugs.debian.org > > > forcemerge 654845 315570 > thanks > > Le mercredi 11 janvier 2012 à 15:53 +0100, roucaries bastien a écrit : >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylves...@debian.org> >> wrote: >>> Le vendredi 06 janvier 2012 à 01:51 -0500, Viral B. Shah a écrit : >>>> Package: libarpack2 >>>> Severity: important >>>> >>>> >>>> ARPACK needs to use LAPACK 2.0 for correctness. This will cause a >>>> conflict with liblapack upon which it depends. See this thread on the >>>> issue and a name mangling fix, so that LAPACK 2.0 routines can be used >>>> in ARPACK. >>> I don't see the issue for now. >>> Could you produce a sample which shows the issue ? >> >> Solved long time ago: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315570 >> >> Sylvain feel free to force-merge if I have understood correctly > OK. > > Thanks for the information > Sylvestre (and not Sylvain ;) > > > > > > > > From: "Viral B. Shah" <vi...@mayin.org> > Subject: libarpack2: ARPACK should link against LAPACK 2.0, and not liblapack > Date: January 6, 2012 12:21:27 PM GMT+05:30 > To: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org> > > > Package: libarpack2 > Severity: important > > > ARPACK needs to use LAPACK 2.0 for correctness. This will cause a > conflict with liblapack upon which it depends. See this thread on the > issue and a name mangling fix, so that LAPACK 2.0 routines can be used > in ARPACK. The BLAS can be the standard one from the debian > distribution. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2011-July/215640.html > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 6.0.3 > APT prefers stable > APT policy: (500, 'stable') > Architecture: i386 (i686) > > Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > Versions of packages libarpack2 depends on: > ii libatlas3gf-3dnow [liblapack. 3.6.0-22 Automatically Tuned Linear > Algebra > ii libblas3gf [libblas.so.3gf] 1.2-8 Basic Linear Algebra Reference > imp > ii libc6 2.11.2-10 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared > lib > ii libgfortran3 4.4.5-8 Runtime library for GNU Fortran > ap > ii liblapack3gf [liblapack.so.3g 3.2.1-8 library of linear algebra > routines > pn libopenmpi1.3 <none> (no description available) > > Versions of packages libarpack2 recommends: > pn atlas3-base <none> (no description available) > > libarpack2 suggests no packages. > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
