On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:06:04AM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > - The check for fortified source functions depends on the use of
> > such functions. If none of them are present the error "no
> > protectable libc functions used" is shown. However, there are also
> > results that show "no" (e.g. /usr/bin/fbsvcmgr). As such, there
> > might indeed be a problem with the LDFLAGS being overwritten.
>
> Most of the binaries suffer from this, and in the end the reason
> appears to be missing usage of CPPFLAGS when compiling C++ sources.
That's correct. I've meant CPPFLAGS.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
