Hi Arthur

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:58:57PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> tags 640781 + pending
> thanks
> 
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 08:13 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > I understand. Thank you, would you think either 1024 or 512 would be
> > acceptable? 
> 
> I'll grown the buffer size to 1024 for the next release.

I would like to ask (not doing pressure :)) if/when there is planned a
release wit nss-pam-ldapd with this fix? Do you think it would be
possible to also ask release managers for inclusion in future point
releases for Squeeze?

If needed I can install and use packages for testing.

Many thanks for your work!

Regards,
Salvatore

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to