Joey Hess <jo...@debian.org> writes: > Gergely Nagy wrote: >> This way, the easy things would remain easy, just a >> "#!/usr/lib/debhelper/dh_subst" away, and harder things would still be >> possible. Everybody wins! > > While this is probably the best way to use executable config files (if > it indeed makes sense to use them), I don't want to be bothered with > maintaining it in debhelper, sorry.
Understandable. Would you find it acceptable to have a separate package, maintained by someone else, in which these scripts would be collected and maintained? (Something along the lines of dh-subst or similar, perhaps..) -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
