On 11/30/2011 10:29 PM, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > -> Last Entry: > 2011-11-06 Adding conflicts against cgroup-bin (Closes: #647769).
on progress-artax branch, correct. > What's the problem here? lxc-debian simply has too many bugs and is the wrong approach. > I cannot agree at all. I use it. I'm just tracking the recent version to > test new features und give feedback. > Sorry - that's completly wrong. You just need to know how to create a > suitable rootfs. lxc-debian from upstream worked best for me (as stable > user). like i said, see the wiki page. > Since I like to use squeeze lxc rootfs on squeeze, I'm willing to help > with the backport of this package. i'm not interested in backports.d.o, feel free to do whatever you like there. > Question: The version 0.7.5-10 was better suitable for experimental. Do > you usually publish into experimental first? as you can see from the changelog, i do uploads to unstable. > Question: I don't like to spam the bug tracking system with discussion > with mailinglist character. Where should discussions like this take > place? Upstream's mailinglist - general/devel? bts is fine for me. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: [email protected] Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
