On Nov 07, Émeric Maschino <emeric.masch...@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems that SOCK_CLOEXEC is thus correctly defined, don't you think so? Yes, but this does not mean that it is also implemented.
> Is there a way to check for "SOCK_CLOEXEC symbol" in the currently > running kernel? This should give a definitive answer regardless > SOCK_CLOEXEC support. No, but you can have a look at the udev code and write a trivial test case for it. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
