* Ron [Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:56:26 +0930]:
> Hi,
> Shouldn't this be a bug against the m68k toolchain? Unless something
> in wxPython changed that I am not aware of, it has always done this
> (and not been a problem) previously, no?
Correct.
> I'm not wholly against patching this package in the name of pragmatism,
> especially if a release were otherwise immediately pending, but since
> it is not, shouldn't we aim this at the real problem first?
Yep. Only, I was worried about this m68k trouble taking too long to
get solved. It's been a while already, and until this very morning I
had not heard there was true progress on it. But it seems it'll be
solved RSN.
> Please feel free to reassign it if you agree that is the case.
> Otherwise, someone will need to convince me that this does not have
> an adverse affect on all the other platforms. (ergo convince me
> that _I_ should not reassign it ;-)
I'd personally just leave it open here until wxwindows2.4 gets rebuilt
on m68k, but your call.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
You've come to the right place. At debian-devel we are always willing
to argue over the meanings of words.
-- seen on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
