On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > Well, if it finds a system library with a shlibs/symbols file, the
> > generated dependency can't really be wrong.
> 
> It can, because some symbols may be missing from the system library that
> are present in the just-built one.

Well, that can only happen with shlibs, not with symbols.

> > When people put debian/compat 9, they want all the features of the new
> > mode (including multiarch support) and they don't expect the feature to be
> > enabled only in some cases.  Note that debhelper build-depends on dpkg-dev
> > (>= 1.16.0) and apparently (from what you say) the backport changes that
> > requirement, it's not a very good backport.

Hum I meant "depends" and not build-depends here.

> I think it would be better to backport dpkg-dev and make
> dpkg-architecture report the empty string as $DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH, but
> nobody has done that yet (and I'm not volunteering).

I plant to backport dpkg but changing the behaviour associated
to version >= 1.16 doesn't seem to be a good idea.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help
liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/go/ulule-rh/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to