On Mon, Oct 17, 2011, Bdale Garbee wrote: > It looks like I did that back in 1999 to get around some problem, and > then over time people have let me know various other architectures work > and so I've added them back in. I think you're right, though, making it > 'any' won't hurt at this point... if it doesn't build on all > architectures, I may get some FTBFS bugs, but they won't be RC if the > package never built on that architecture before...
Makes sense; thanks! -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
