hi,
> > 2) Assuming that .dpatch continues to be the default extension, you
> > should (in my opinion) ensure that the behavior of dpatch-convert-diffgz
> > is consistent with the sample 00list files in the documentation.
>
> Oh, one other minor (related) issue:
>
> dpatch-convert-diffgz creates patches where the number and name are
> separated by an '_', but the documentation lists .dpatch files with '-' as
> the separater. Again, the two should be consistent.
>
The main problem is that dpatch has been rewritten;
and quite a few things are changed.
dpatch-convert-diffgz was written for dpatch 1, and the README then
documented that.
Documentation, code feature, and what it does are not agreeing
with each other, currently.
I'm trying to fix that inconsistency through adding testsuites
etc.
Help would be appreciated.
regards,
junichi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
