Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 01:35:08PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>
>> Well, I can write up a patch and send it to upstream, but that's
>> no guarantee it'll be picked up. It is a backward-incompatible
>> change.
>>
>> If that's what you want, I can probably do it sometime this
>> week. (I am very busy right now.)
>
> That is all I'm asking.
I believe that the following patch fixes the problem:
diff -ur tmp/autoconf-2.59a/lib/autoconf/libs.m4
autoconf-2.59a/lib/autoconf/libs.m4
--- tmp/autoconf-2.59a/lib/autoconf/libs.m4 2005-09-14 21:50:55.000000000
-0700
+++ autoconf-2.59a/lib/autoconf/libs.m4 2005-09-14 21:47:42.000000000 -0700
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@
else
dnl If we are called with less than 3 arguments, use the defaults
m4_ifval([$3], [_AC_PATH_X($@)],
- [_AC_PATH_X([Xt],[X11/Intrinsic.h],[XtMalloc (0)])])
+ [_AC_PATH_X([X11],[X11/Xlib.h],[XrmInitialize ()])])
fi
eval "$ac_cv_have_x"
fi # $with_x != no
A binary package built with this patch is available from:
http://footstool.stanford.edu/~blp/autoconf_2.59a-3.1_all.deb
Please confirm that this fixes the problem for you and I will
pass it along to upstream.
--
"In the PARTIES partition there is a small section called the BEER.
Prior to turning control over to the PARTIES partition,
the BIOS must measure the BEER area into PCR[5]."
--TCPA PC Specific Implementation Specification
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
