On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 08:55:56PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 06:08:26PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > There is libapt-pkg-perl and when you have packages depending on that > > upgrading apt separately from perl is not possible. > > That means telling users to just upgrade to the wheezy apt before > dist-upgrading is insufficient. So I think that yes, we should revert the > breaks. OK, I've requested that in #640300. > > (I still think we should have a Breaks entry somewhere, probably gcc, > > but we have plenty of time to discuss and implement that afterwards.) > > gcc seems like a reasonable place to do this. Thanks. As the default on all the release architectures is currently gcc-4.6, I suppose that's the right place. If somebody has better ideas, please let me know. -- Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
