On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 23:01, concentricpuddle <concentricpud...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> >>> ... so I discovered a quite important thing: the documentation built >> >> >>> >>> with sphinx requires the file templatebuiltins.js, but the docs >>> >>> tarball doesn't contain it. It's a file from django (the template >>> >>> puddletag doc uses) so I think it just need to be copied in the docs >>> >>> dir and added to the license file (it's practically what I've done in >>> >>> Debian to tick this point). >> >> I didn't notice. Might be due to the fact that I was using a latest >> version of Sphinx. > > Even weirder is that I don't have templatebuiltins.js anywhere on my system > (not even in the original Django template the docs are based on).
it works fine even without it but it's referred from the template so our automatic tools identifies it and errors out since it can't find it. If you don't need it, it's probably best to get rid of it on the template. >> >> Ok, something has come up, related to puddlestuff/resource.py: IIUIC >>> >>> that file is generated by pyrcc4 from puddlestuff/resourec.qrc which >>> in turn is a "bundle" of the images contained in puddlestuff/data . >>> Now, as per Debian policy, we need the puddlestuff/resourec.qrc and >>> all the data/ images in the tarball: currently we have only some image >>> (we need all of them) and we mist he .qrc file. >>> >>> concentricpuddle: could you please add them and release a new tarball ? >>> >> >> Not a problem.I'll upload it on the weekend. > > Uploaded > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/puddletag/files/puddletag-0.10.6-2.tar.gz). sorry to be picky, but could you please avoid '-n' in the version number? those format is the one used by debian for its internal release, and it would be preferible (ie it's easier from a packging point of view) if the version is only digits and dots (so if you want to mark a very minor release 0.10.6.1, 0.10.6.2 and so on are the most preferred formats). thanks for your understanding :) > I've also included the French translation source and some other stuff. > As for resourec.qrc (I should really fix that spelling), it contains links > only to files that are used by puddletag. All those were included in the > tarball. Any other data in the dev repo should've deen deleted ages ago (and > pretty soon will be). resourec.qrc is the preferred way to modify resource.py (since qrc is converted py via a tool) so we must have in the tarball we upload along with the dbian pkg, given .qrc is actually made of images, they should be shipped too (and you do, so that's ok). Could you please reconsider adding it to the released tarball? Thanks in advance, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
