Your bug report
#9326: Bug#638388: update bug addresses to point to bug-coreutils instead
which was filed against the coreutils package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 9...@debbugs.gnu.org.
--
9326: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9326
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debb...@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
tag 9326 notabug
thanks
[Here's hoping that the GNU debbugs bug 9326, for coreutils is closed,
without negatively impacting debian bug 638388]
On 08/18/2011 05:31 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Package: findutils
X-debbugs-Cc: bug-coreut...@gnu.org
Version: 4.5.10-1
Severity: minor
According to http://article.gmane.org/gmane.discuss/14277
any mention of e.g., bug-findutils should be updated throughout this and
other affected packages.
I have no idea why you submitted this as a coreutils bug. The
bug-findutils address that you mention is in active use by the findutils
package; and a 'git grep' of 'fileutils' within the findutils package
shows that findutils does not have any stale references to the old
coreutils mailing aliases. Likewise for a grep of the coreutils sources
- the only references to the old addresses are in historical notes.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: findutils
X-debbugs-Cc: bug-coreut...@gnu.org
Version: 4.5.10-1
Severity: minor
According to http://article.gmane.org/gmane.discuss/14277
any mention of e.g., bug-findutils should be updated throughout this and
other affected packages.
--- End Message ---
