Hello, On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:29:41PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Uhm... It doesn't look, like boost1.42 is obsolete. Even if I ignore > non-release architectures, there's quite a lot of stuff left: > > > Checking reverse dependencies... > # Broken Depends: [...] > # Broken Build-Depends: [...] OK, I've done NMUs for the last few packages that build-depend on boost1.42. There remain a dozen or so packages that depend on boost1.42; can these be rebuilt (against the newer boost) so that boost1.42 can be removed. Thanks, -Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
