Hi, On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:41:09AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 07:47:49AM +0200, josch wrote: > > This could be avoided by setting the proposed environment variable > > QEMU_LD_PREFIX to the just > > created debian rootfs. As mentioned earlier, the usage of the -L option > > is not possible in this scenario because qemu-user is only implicitly > > called by the binfmt mechanism. > > What worries me here is that we are beginning to add a enviroment > variable for each and every command line option of qemu linux-user.
Are there other environment variables? I didnt see any? (well besides QEMU_STRACE that is) > I think it would be better to have a wrapper binary to be registered > as the binfmt runner. If you need help with writing something - dont hesitate to ask for help. I'm very interested in having this functionality working because of the reasons I gave in my initial mail. [1] > Alternatively we should have a generic setup for mapping enviroment > variables to command line options. Now we get special per-option code > every time someone needs to setup a command line option from binfmt. What other options are there that would be interesting for binfmt? I was also sending this patch to qemu-devel list a month ago but got no reply. [2] As I said - if you would like a wrapper or a generic setup for mapping env variables to commandline parameters and dont have time to do it yourself, dont hesitate to delegate some work to me :) @Geert Stappers: you are patching bsd-user/main.c and darwin-user/main.c as well. I take it that you did test your changes on those platforms? does it work there as well? I have no clue of darwin but is it really useful there? cheers, josch [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632192#5 [2] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-07/msg00459.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
