Package: uim
Version: 1:1.7.0-2
Severity: normal
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 10:18:56PM +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
> override file for the following file(s):
>
> libuim-data_1.7.0-2_all.deb: package says section is misc, override says libs.
> uim-anthy_1.7.0-2_amd64.deb: package says section is utils, override says
> libs.
> uim-canna_1.7.0-2_amd64.deb: package says section is utils, override says
> libs.
> uim-common_1.7.0-2_all.deb: package says section is utils, override says text.
> uim-el_1.7.0-2_amd64.deb: package says section is utils, override says lisp.
> uim-fep_1.7.0-2_amd64.deb: package says section is utils, override says text.
> uim-m17nlib_1.7.0-2_amd64.deb: package says section is utils, override says
> libs.
> uim-prime_1.7.0-2_amd64.deb: package says section is utils, override says
> libs.
> uim-skk_1.7.0-2_amd64.deb: package says section is utils, override says libs.
> uim_1.7.0-2_all.deb: package says section is utils, override says text.
>
>
> Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
> archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell,
> httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video,
> xfce, zope. At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into
> these sections. If this is the case, please only reply to this email if
> the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package
> at the next upload.
>
> Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
> the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
> so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the
> override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and
> explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we
> won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information.
>
> Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the
> following format:
>
> Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority
>
> Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please.
--
Regards,
daiGPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
