Hi Kees
2011/7/20 Kees Cook <k...@debian.org>:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:12:09PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>> This package is not installable on kfreebsd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64 because it
>> depends unconditionally on fuse-utils.
>
> Shouldn't fuse-utils and fuse4bsd instead provide a single "fuse" common
> package that things can use?
No. fuse4bsd isn't always a direct replacement for fuse, it depends
on your packages' needs. For example s3ql makes direct calls to
fusermount:
./src/s3ql/cli/umount.py: umount_cmd = ('fusermount', '-u', '-z', mountpoint)
./src/s3ql/cli/umount.py: if subprocess.call(['fusermount', '-u',
mountpoint]) != 0:
and needed small changes before it could work with fuse4bsd.
Also, some of the dependencies on fuse are versioned.
(Btw, fuse-utils is just a transitional package that depends on fuse)
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
