* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > tag 327216 wontfix > thanks > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:52:12PM +0200, Tom Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Package: mozilla-firefox > > Version: 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-2 > > Severity: normal > > > > There's a lack of update-mozilla-firefox-chrome, which means that > > extension packages don't get properly installed. > > That's on purpose. Extensions packagers are encouraged to check if the > script exist before running it. That will be part of the new version of > the extensions packaging guidelines for firefox, and subject of possible > mass bug filing. > Extensions will anyway need update to actually work with firefox deer > park and newer. > > While I first wanted to put an empty script for compatibility, I finally > decided that it was useless. That'd be the best way to have to still > provide it in 3 years, even though no version of mozilla-firefox > requiring it would be available in the archive. > > On the long term, extensions package will just have to not run the > update-mozilla-firefox-chrome.
I agree that this is probably the right approach. -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature