Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> writes: Hi :) > Hi, > [...] > why was halevt re-uploaded to unstable? I'm trying hard to get rid of hal for > wheezy, so uploading new packages depending on the obsolete hal doesn't strike > me as a good idea.
The main reason: Some users like and use it. Popcon says +- 150, but probably this value is high. We know that hal will not be part of wheezy. Why hal is in testing/unstable? I think that halevt should be removed when hal is. Regards, Talau
pgpbwFJhrPEJ4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
