Am Samstag, den 19.03.2011, 19:43 +0000 schrieb Arand Nash: > Initial report is somewhat erroneous, some of this is detailed in > README.Debian, items in include/ are not in the binary package. > However, they are still in the dfsg.orig.tar.gz, which I assume is a > problem. It's not a problem as long as they are DFSG-compliant. I once read somewhere in the maintainer guide, that we should only remove non-DFSG stuff from .orig.tar.gz files as Debian users should be expected to build/compile software for different platforms from our .orig.tar.gz sources. I was searching the maintainers' guide for the exact wording, but failed to find it, so I can't give evidence here (d'oh!). Honestly I don't think there are many users out there who really use our .orig.tar.gz files to compile software for any *BSD or whatever ;)
> (./include/wincompat.h is "all rights reserved" hence impossible to > distribute, no?). Uhm, there you're right. I think I remove that file (and others, if there are more) and do a $VERSION-repack.dfsg upload with full sources. Any objections? > Also, the additional ./enet/ items are not mentioned in the > README.Debian nor in the copyright That's not true (phew! ;) ) it's mentioned at the end of debian/copyright. > It seems like the package builds fine with the include/ directory > removed, why is it in the dfsg tarball? Oops, I already answered that above. Greetings - Fuddl
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
