Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've reassigned this bug from the kernel to gcc-4.0 as we feel that the
> solution chosen in the kernel packaging is not really a fix, but a
> workaround.
> As tests have shown that the problem does not exist when the same kernel
> is compiled with gcc-3.3, the real bug is likely in gcc-4.0.
It would be extremely helpful if you could find a way to reproduce
this that does not require root... any ideas?
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
