tags 625131 + patch tags 625131 + pending thanks Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for cachefilesd (versioned as 0.9-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/05. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. It looks like there are some other issues that could be fixed: - lintian errors and warnings (http://lintian.debian.org/full/[email protected]#cachefilesd) - outstanding bugs - a new upstream version Though I'm only fixing the RC bug with this NMU. Please tell me if you would appreciate me becoming co-maintainer or NMUing for the other issues as well. Cheers Luk
diff -u cachefilesd-0.9/debian/changelog cachefilesd-0.9/debian/changelog --- cachefilesd-0.9/debian/changelog +++ cachefilesd-0.9/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +cachefilesd (0.9-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add missing headers to fix FTBFS (Closes: #625131). + + -- Luk Claes <[email protected]> Sun, 22 May 2011 17:08:35 +0200 + cachefilesd (0.9-3) unstable; urgency=low * Added logcheck ignore file. (Closes: 534581) only in patch2: unchanged: --- cachefilesd-0.9.orig/cachefilesd.c +++ cachefilesd-0.9/cachefilesd.c @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ #include <sys/inotify.h> #include <sys/time.h> #include <sys/vfs.h> +#include <sys/stat.h> +#include <sys/types.h> typedef enum objtype { OBJTYPE_INDEX,
