When looking at bug #577146, the thought comes to mind; is halt the correct action to do in case of power failure?
Thing is, "halt" generally means going down for operator intervention of some kind. Possibly hardware maintainance, perhaps to retire the system, those sorts of longish downtime actions. Whereas shutdown due to UPS status isn't supposed to be a prolonged outage, merely a brief downtime until power is restored. Given this, might "reboot" be a better init runlevel to use for UPS power failing? -- (\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/) \BS ( | e...@gremlin.m5p.com PGP F6B23DE0 | ) / \_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/ 2477\___\_|_/DC21 03A0 5D61 985B <-PGP-> F2BE 6526 ABD2 F6B2\_|_/___/3DE0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
