Hi, On Fri, 06 May 2011 01:50:53 +0900 (JST) Tatsuya Kinoshita <[email protected]> wrote: > The upstream license, IPA Font License Agreement v1.0, is copyleft > license and incompatible with GPL.
Yes, those license are incompatible. > However, this Debian packaging license is GPL-3. It is problematic > if the upstream part is modified with packaging. Most of the case, if modifies would be needed to ttf-takao, takao upstream - also package maintainer of this - would deal with it by changing font file itself. So, the situation you mention is rare. And if we have to modify font file with packaging, we just choose another license for that file, don't we? On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:00:36 +0200 Christian PERRIER <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you formally agree with this and are you OK to change the license > of the packaging of the abovementioned font package accordingly? > > We need a formal agreement by both of you guys to make this change. I'm okay but I want to clear the situation that IPAfont license and GPL would be conflict. If it is reasonable, then we'll change it. Also, I would like to choice 3-clues BSD license rather than IPAfont license if we'll change the license. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
