Steve Langasek wrote:
> There are numerous bugs now that make it impossible to rebuild
> busybox-cvs in either etch or sid.  Does anyone really still need this
> package, or can it be killed off now?
> 

I can live with busybox instead. But how is busybox-cvs 20040623-1
related to the busybox 1:1.01-1 package?


Regards

Harri

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to