On jeu., 2011-04-21 at 18:14 +0200, Sebastian Dalfuß wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 04:13:16PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > Thunar already recommends: gvfs but it might recommends gvfs-bin too > > (which will bring udisks). > > *facedesk* > This bug can get closed now. > I didnt't have gvfs installed.
Haha, no problem :) > mea culpa > But: > A little update on documentation and dependencies could make it easier for > other users who will run into problems like that to figure out what's wrong > Thunar still tells (in /usr/share/doc/html) that it needs HAL for purposes > of removable media. udisks isnt't recommended by thunar, thunar-volman, > gvfs and also gvfs-bin (but gvfs-bin isn't nessecary for thunar-volman > anyway). Yeah, the upstream documentation is quite outdated :/ The problem with gvfs is that it'll pull gconf and thus I'm not a huge fan of having it forced onto every Xfce user. > The README.Debian of thunar says that you need gvfs, but I didn't find it, > because I looked for that kind of information in the docs of thunar-volman, > because this was the package I had trouble with; so thunar-volman could maybe > use a little Readme.Debian as well. Since Thunar can do it's job well without > gvfs, but thunar-volman can't do anything at all without it, it might not be > the worst idea to add it as "recommends" or hard dependency to thunar-volman, > and even maybe lower it for Thunar to "suggests". Yeah, the dependencies will need a bit more tuning, I think (and this kind of bug helps for that, too). Regards, -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
