On lun., 2011-04-18 at 17:46 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > I don't follow. You are suggesting that SyncEvolution in > Testing/Unstable should have a depends >= 2.30, <= 2.32, right?
Something like that. > > How is that going to help a user who has Evolution and SyncEvolution > installed on Squeeze and then does a partial update of just Evolution > with "aptitude install -t testing evolution"? > > If I'm not completely mistaken, aptitude will complete leave > SyncEvolution alone and installed in the Squeeze version together with > the old libecal/ebook, thus leading to a broken system. It'll prevent upgrading the lib to 2.32 if syncevolution isn't updated together. The real fix in fact would be to add that dependency to the shlibs of whatever lib syncevolution has issues with (which I still don't know right now). Regards, -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
