On Di, 2011-04-12 at 13:10 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > It would be nice, if update() supported that as an argument, e.g. > > reopen=True > > The default could be False to keep backward compatibility. No, we'd need yet another parameter for specifying the progress handler for open() then.
> Apart from this the documentation really needs to state > that an open() is required after that. The info can be obtained > from the examples, but thats probably not the right place. > Better would be to state that requirement in update() documentation. We can add this. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
