On Apr 12, Kevin Mitchell <kevmi...@math.sfu.ca> wrote: > * It turned out I had a static /run with junk in it which is what the > above message was referring to as /dev/.udev. Deleting this erroneous > /run also solved the problem independent of using devtmpfs. Yes, this was my theory.
> At the very least I think the ".udev/ already exists . . ." message > should only be displayed if that's actually the case. A separate "/run/udev > already exists > . . ." should be reserved for the case I had. This would have led to a > far quicker diagnosis.x I will check what can be done in time for the next upload. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
