On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:50:25PM +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> I was not able to reproduce this, can you please ensure you have the
> correct /etc/fpc.cfg file as there is a know issue when upgrading.
>
> Please provide the output of "ls /etc/fpc.cfg"
/etc/fpc.cfg -> /etc/alternatives/fpc.cfg
> as well as "update-alternatives --display fpc" "update-alternatives
> --display fp-utils"
[~]# update-alternatives --display fpc
fpc - auto mode
link currently points to /usr/bin/fpc-2.4.2
/usr/bin/fpc-2.4.2 - priority 20
slave fpc-depends: /usr/bin/fpc-depends-2.4.2
slave fpc-depends.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/fpc-depends-2.4.2.1.gz
slave fpc.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/fpc-2.4.2.1.gz
slave ppcx64: /usr/lib/fpc/2.4.2/ppcx64
slave ppcx64.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/ppcx64-2.4.2.1.gz
Current 'best' version is '/usr/bin/fpc-2.4.2'.
[~]# update-alternatives --display fp-utils
fp-utils - auto mode
link currently points to /usr/lib/fpc/2.4.2
/usr/lib/fpc/2.4.2 - priority 20
slave bin2obj: /usr/bin/bin2obj-2.4.2
slave bin2obj.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/bin2obj-2.4.2.1.gz
slave chmcmd: /usr/bin/chmcmd-2.4.2
slave chmcmd.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/chmcmd-2.4.2.1.gz
slave chmls: /usr/bin/chmls-2.4.2
slave chmls.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/chmls-2.4.2.1.gz
slave data2inc: /usr/bin/data2inc-2.4.2
slave data2inc.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/data2inc-2.4.2.1.gz
slave delp: /usr/bin/delp-2.4.2
slave delp.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/delp-2.4.2.1.gz
slave fpclasschart: /usr/bin/fpclasschart-2.4.2
slave fpclasschart.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/fpclasschart-2.4.2.1.gz
slave fpcmake: /usr/bin/fpcmake-2.4.2
slave fpcmake.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/fpcmake-2.4.2.1.gz
slave fpcmake.5.gz: /usr/share/man/man5/fpcmake-2.4.2.5.gz
slave fpcres: /usr/bin/fpcres-2.4.2
slave fpcres.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/fpcres-2.4.2.1.gz
slave fpcsubst: /usr/bin/fpcsubst-2.4.2
slave fpcsubst.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/fpcsubst-2.4.2.1.gz
slave fpdoc: /usr/bin/fpdoc-2.4.2
slave fpdoc.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/fpdoc-2.4.2.1.gz
slave fplexyacc: /usr/lib/fpc/2.4.2/lexyacc
slave fppkg: /usr/bin/fppkg-2.4.2
slave fppkg.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/fppkg-2.4.2.1.gz
slave fprcp: /usr/bin/fprcp-2.4.2
slave fprcp.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/fprcp-2.4.2.1.gz
slave h2pas: /usr/bin/h2pas-2.4.2
slave h2pas.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/h2pas-2.4.2.1.gz
slave h2paspp: /usr/bin/h2paspp-2.4.2
slave h2paspp.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/h2paspp-2.4.2.1.gz
slave makeskel: /usr/bin/makeskel-2.4.2
slave makeskel.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/makeskel-2.4.2.1.gz
slave mkxmlrpc: /usr/bin/mkxmlrpc-2.4.2
slave mkxmlrpc.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/mkxmlrpc-2.4.2.1.gz
slave plex: /usr/bin/plex-2.4.2
slave plex.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/plex-2.4.2.1.gz
slave postw32: /usr/bin/postw32-2.4.2
slave postw32.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/postw32-2.4.2.1.gz
slave ppdep: /usr/bin/ppdep-2.4.2
slave ppdep.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/ppdep-2.4.2.1.gz
slave ppudump: /usr/bin/ppudump-2.4.2
slave ppudump.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/ppudump-2.4.2.1.gz
slave ppufiles: /usr/bin/ppufiles-2.4.2
slave ppufiles.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/ppufiles-2.4.2.1.gz
slave ppumove: /usr/bin/ppumove-2.4.2
slave ppumove.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/ppumove-2.4.2.1.gz
slave ptop: /usr/bin/ptop-2.4.2
slave ptop.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/ptop-2.4.2.1.gz
slave ptop.cfg.5.gz: /usr/share/man/man5/ptop-2.4.2.cfg.5.gz
slave pyacc: /usr/bin/pyacc-2.4.2
slave pyacc.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/pyacc-2.4.2.1.gz
slave rmcvsdir: /usr/bin/rmcvsdir-2.4.2
slave rmcvsdir.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/rmcvsdir-2.4.2.1.gz
slave rstconv: /usr/bin/rstconv-2.4.2
slave rstconv.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/rstconv-2.4.2.1.gz
slave unitdiff: /usr/bin/unitdiff-2.4.2
slave unitdiff.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/unitdiff-2.4.2.1.gz
Current 'best' version is '/usr/lib/fpc/2.4.2'.
> Can you please check if dpkg-reconfigure fp-compiler fixes the issue?
It doesn't, and neither does purging everything fpc related and installing anew.
I noticed that installing the whole fpc distribution rather than just
fp-compiler and dependencies (-units-rtl and -utils) produces several pages
of linker warnings rather than just a few. All are the same:
/usr/bin/ld: warning: link.res:1:19: ignoring SEARCH_DIR; SEARCH_DIR is only
valid for scripts specified via -T/--script
I tried it on a couple of other sid systems:
* another amd64, same crash + warnings
* i386, no crash, a different warning:
/usr/bin/ld.bfd.real: warning: link.res contains output sections; did you
forget -T?
--
1KB // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor:
// Never attribute to stupidity what can be
// adequately explained by malice.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
