Hi,

On Sun, 03 Apr 2011, Craig Sanders wrote:
> 1. it segfaulted! (fortunately, /var/lib/dpkg/status wasn't corrupted)
> 
> 2. it claimed it was installing a package called 'xŒ—)' which does
>    not exist. probably related to #1 above (buffer overrun or similar,
>    perhaps?)
> 
>    (in case those 8-bit chars get mangled by an MTA, that's '788C 9729'
>    in hex)

Both problems are related. And I just pushed a fix for this.

> 3. version numbers which have been valid for years are now being
>    complained about as if they are invalid.

That's not a mistake. Version numbers are supposed to start with a digit.

dpkg still accepts them for installed packages but forbids them in .deb.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
                      ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to